Claude Agent SDK · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 · as published
anthropic
as publishedIts score and figures
Every figure the leaderboard's table prints for this setup.
| rank in group | 1–12 |
|---|---|
| Score | 84.9 pts81.9–86.8 pts |
| Pass rate | 98.6%95.7–100.0%98.6% · 69 of 69 graded |
| Efficiency | 43.935.0–47.8 |
| cost | 1.1× |
| tokens | 2.3× |
| time | 0.39× |
| Coverage | 1/6 |
| Runs | 69 |
73.9 + 2.6 + 0.8 + 7.6 = 84.9 (outcome + cost + tokens + time)
- pass rate on each benchmark's own grader
- cost
- tokens
- time
- not measured
- First run
- 2026-10-03
- Last run
- 2026-10-03
- did not finish (scored as a fail)
- 0
- Tasks with no grade
- 0
On each benchmark
Each benchmark it ran: its status, pass rate, spend and spend per pass. The studies behind them are its evidence, below.
IFEval
84.9 pts
IFEval: 98.6% · 69 of 69 graded · scored
- cost
- 1.1× the typical spend per passing run1.1% of this setup's cost here went to runs that did not pass or were not graded; efficiency does not price it$0.01 per pass($0.01–$0.02)30% went to the costliest 10% of attempts (7 of 69)
- tokens
- 2.3× the typical spend per passing run1.3% of this setup's tokens here went to runs that did not pass or were not graded; efficiency does not price it35k per pass(32.1k–38.5k)20% went to the costliest 10% of attempts (7 of 69)cache split not recorded on 69 attempts
- time
- 0.39× the typical spend per passing run0.9% of this setup's time here went to runs that did not pass or were not graded; efficiency does not price it11.9s per pass(9.2s–15.2s)36% went to the costliest 10% of attempts (7 of 69)
Efficiency and spend per pass can order setups differently: efficiency compares the typical (median) passing run, task by task, while spend per pass averages every attempt, so a few very expensive runs, passing or not, count in full; and spend per pass also counts the attempts that failed or did not finish, and divides by the pass rate. A setup is called the most frugal only where both put it first and both separate it from every other setup.
Evidence
Every published study its runs come from.
- ifeval-13-harnesses-2026-10 (69 runs)