Claude Code · claude-sonnet-5-5 · as published
anthropic
as publishedIts score and figures
Every figure the leaderboard's table prints for this setup.
| rank in group | 1–12 |
|---|---|
| Score | 78.7 pts76.2–80.2 pts |
| Pass rate | 98.6%95.7–100.0%98.6% · 69 of 69 graded |
| Efficiency | 19.115.5–21.3 |
| cost | 2.4× |
| tokens | 1.9× |
| time | 1.1× |
| Coverage | 1/6 |
| Runs | 69 |
73.9 + 1.2 + 0.9 + 2.6 ≈ 78.7 (outcome + cost + tokens + time)
- pass rate on each benchmark's own grader
- cost
- tokens
- time
- not measured
- First run
- 2026-10-03
- Last run
- 2026-10-03
- did not finish (scored as a fail)
- 1
- Tasks with no grade
- 0
On each benchmark
Each benchmark it ran: its status, pass rate, spend and spend per pass. The studies behind them are its evidence, below.
IFEval
78.7 pts
IFEval: 98.6% · 69 of 69 graded · scored
- cost
- 2.4× the typical spend per passing run1.5% of this setup's cost here went to runs that did not pass or were not graded; efficiency does not price it$0.03 per pass($0.02–$0.03)27% went to the costliest 10% of attempts (7 of 69)
- tokens
- 1.9× the typical spend per passing run2.7% of this setup's tokens here went to runs that did not pass or were not graded; efficiency does not price it32k per pass(29.9k–35k)15% went to the costliest 10% of attempts (7 of 69)of which 85% cache reads and 11% fresh input
- time
- 1.1× the typical spend per passing run0.8% of this setup's time here went to runs that did not pass or were not graded; efficiency does not price it24.8s per pass(21.8s–29.2s)22% went to the costliest 10% of attempts (7 of 69)
Efficiency and spend per pass can order setups differently: efficiency compares the typical (median) passing run, task by task, while spend per pass averages every attempt, so a few very expensive runs, passing or not, count in full; and spend per pass also counts the attempts that failed or did not finish, and divides by the pass rate. A setup is called the most frugal only where both put it first and both separate it from every other setup.
Evidence
Every published study its runs come from.
- ifeval-13-harnesses-2026-10 (69 runs)