opencode · claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 · as published
anthropic
as publishedIts score and figures
Every figure the leaderboard's table prints for this setup.
| rank in group | 1–12 |
|---|---|
| Score | 62.7 pts54.5–70.5 pts |
| Pass rate | 65.2%55.1–75.4%65.2% · 69 of 69 graded |
| Efficiency | 55.150.6–57.9 |
| cost | 0.35× |
| tokens | 0.67× |
| time | 1.0× |
| Coverage | 1/6 |
| Runs | 69 |
48.9 + 8.3 + 2.6 + 2.8 ≈ 62.7 (outcome + cost + tokens + time)
- pass rate on each benchmark's own grader
- cost
- tokens
- time
- not measured
- First run
- 2026-10-03
- Last run
- 2026-10-03
- did not finish (scored as a fail)
- 0
- Tasks with no grade
- 0
On each benchmark
Each benchmark it ran: its status, pass rate, spend and spend per pass. The studies behind them are its evidence, below.
IFEval
62.7 pts
IFEval: 65.2% · 69 of 69 graded · scored
- cost
- 0.35× the typical spend per passing run25.1% of this setup's cost here went to runs that did not pass or were not graded; efficiency does not price it$0.0046 per pass($0.0036–$0.01)32% went to the costliest 10% of attempts (7 of 69)
- tokens
- 0.67× the typical spend per passing run32.6% of this setup's tokens here went to runs that did not pass or were not graded; efficiency does not price it14k per pass(11.8k–16.7k)19% went to the costliest 10% of attempts (7 of 69)cache split not recorded on 69 attempts
- time
- 1.0× the typical spend per passing run32.6% of this setup's time here went to runs that did not pass or were not graded; efficiency does not price it29.7s per pass(25.5s–35.5s)15% went to the costliest 10% of attempts (7 of 69)
Efficiency and spend per pass can order setups differently: efficiency compares the typical (median) passing run, task by task, while spend per pass averages every attempt, so a few very expensive runs, passing or not, count in full; and spend per pass also counts the attempts that failed or did not finish, and divides by the pass rate. A setup is called the most frugal only where both put it first and both separate it from every other setup.
Evidence
Every published study its runs come from.
- ifeval-13-harnesses-2026-10 (69 runs)